Comments on: 5 Weirdest Creatures Ever Found

By: Maranda

Maranda — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:09:12 +0000

Photo #2 Montauk Monster is a horribly decomposed Capybara, relative to the chinchilla and guinea pig.

By: Maranda

Maranda — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:04:30 +0000

Well the last photo does look similar to triops cancriformis, but one problem. Look at the tail of it, it looks nothing like that of triops cancriformis. It is in fact not a triops cancriformis but rather it’s sister species known as triops australiensis. There are very distinct differences between the two. The sheild is a bit different as well as tail.

By: deadmanwalkin666

deadmanwalkin666 — Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:26:59 +0000

ok the last photo is clearly a few enlarged and enhanced photos of Triops Cancriformis lol i use to raise them so i’d know one if i saw one and thats one of them. Unless the area was full of radiation and caused some kind of mutation to cause that one to be huge compared to others but i doubt it.

By: Saromin

Saromin — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:12:33 +0000

that ‘wierd creature’ that looks like a stingfish is a prehistoric ocean creature ^^

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:26:07 +0000

Number 3 looks more like a capebarra than a cow, dog, sloth, etc. It does have rodent features including the small snout bone that could apear to be a beak to some people, but its not its just the snout structure.

By: Javocih

Javocih — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 04:32:41 +0000

The montauk monster is not a raccoon go outside in the the with a flashlight for once in ur life. Pig is close but it’s actually a wild boar. Don’t tell me it a co*n Ive seen raccoon and if the ones in citys look like that then someone fed them to much and beat them with a bat just saying

By: Claire

Claire — Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:02:00 +0000

That creature found in Montauk is crazy looking… maybe a cross between a goat/lamb and a chicken? I agree that it was furry at one point, but not a decomposed cow.

I believe the first 3, the last couple not so much. That piglet is cute.