These images can scare anyone no mater you like dogs or not:
This is not a kind the way you would like your dog to look like, because winning this contest means that your dog has failed badly. Or we could say that nature has failed badly when it comes to your dogs appearance. At least you can look the funny side of this and laugh at the appearance of these ugly dogs (ugliest than I have ever dreamed of anyway).
Watching images of these ugly pets is bound to give you nightmares (so please, proceed with caution through this image gallery). Have fun (if you can), and good luck to you.
The first pic is a sculpture. Not real.
The rest, well they’re real but there are several pics of the same dog. Also the one where the person is holding the dog’s ears up, that is a Wirehaired Pointing Griffon (dog breed) and their ears don’t stand up like that– they have floppy ears, the person is just holding them up.
The rest are mostly mutts/crossbreeds and a few Chinese Cresteds.
If this is real pics it is insane. Poor dogs
Not nature made!! Human made!! Stupid idiots breeding dogs by interchanging species without knowing, what they’re doing!!! First one seems to be a sculpture!
The sculpture i think is awesome.. ive seen most these animal breeding mutations before, but my question is.. what in the hell is wrong with these people. Why would you breed your dog to look like this? its unfair.. and the last one scares me.. soo sad..
Errr…. the first one is not a dog, it’s called Art.
The first picture is not by Ron Mueck. The credit goes to Patricia Piccinini.
ALL OF PICS ARE FAKE…………MAGIC OF PHOTOSHOP………………
Wow, beautiful dogs – who need medical attention.
You all need to grow up a bit.
Leave them alone, you’r all waisting you’r time, nature has it’s own ways, ho are you to even discuss about that?
You’r all a miracle of nature, and believe it or not, these creatures, that you consider ugly, are miracles too, so grow up.
Not nature fail, breeding fail. Most mutations of domestic dogs are due to human breeding, not purely “natural” evolution (except in the sense that we are natural creatures as well).
Some of the dogs are maybe results of breeding mistakes, but some of them are just severaly sick, like the one on pic #4, and others. I think they need medical attention.
wonderfrul
So many dogs: So few recipets
Although Ron Muek creates quiet similar surrealist works – the first dog isn’t his art.
The first ‘Dog’ is by Puccinini http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
the first image is a sculpture by artist ron mueck.
The top ‘dog’ is not a dog – It looks like a magic dragon to me. The other dogs are not conventionally beautiful but I would love them all the same
I don’t know what that first thing is but its not a dog. Most of the rest of the pics I have seen before, most were contestants or winners of ugly dog contests.
I am afraid this type of dog posture. I do n`t think this can appear
first pic is a sculpture like everyone has already pointed out
however, those dogs were probably abused and can’t control it. you should be ashamed for making fun of them.
and i have a feeling the guy who made this article looks like cookie monster and ronald mcdonald had a lovechild and poured HCl (hydrachloric acid) all over his body
so yeah, stfu
Ya wanna hear crazy… It is my truth (and whether you know this or not, MILLIONS of other peoples truth that humanity is ready for our next phase in evolution. Well… dogs are too. I heard Humans will soon be super humans, with newly evolved bodies and dogs… well, they will become humans! Wanna look at pic number one again? It was a hard one for me to believe but now???? Follow me on facebook for more WT??! sol destiny
Why do I have a strange feeling beastiality was involved with the first picture?
This is just getting silly. That picture is circling all over the internet either as ‘ugly dog’ or ‘human-dog hybrid’ it’s NOT. That picture is from an art gallery by the artist Patricia Piccinini right here: http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
They are SCULPTURES she did for the ‘we are family’ exhibit she did. She also did a few other animal-human hybrid statues. Don’t believe everything you read, go research it people.
It should be pointed out that, strictly speaking, none of these dogs qualify as “mother nature’s” creations. Humans have been selectively breeding dogs for thousands of years to create the variety of breeds we have today. These dogs, ugly or not, are the result of deliberate selection rather than natural selection.
They should really point out that the first image is a sculpture. One is led to believe that these are real dogs. Granted, this is just for entertainment’s sake, but it would still be nice to have images documented appropriately. You can Google “human dog sculpture” to see more images of the sculpture.
I don’t think any of the dogs are ugly. They are God’s creation. Sure you can find human that uglier than these dogs.
mother nature was drunk when she made this dogs
Sorry, I think you’re mistaken, The first is a sculpture by artist Patricia Piccinini from her collection ‘We are family’, you can find it here http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
the first pic is a sculpture by Ron Muick!
he top one looks real. I bet that just wax
duh the second pic is a hairless Chinese crested which those dogs have the most mutations due to their breed background and your all stupid if you think the first one is real but its a great job from the artist
When I first saw the top one, I was scared shi*less. I kept looking overing my shoulder while I was trying to fall asleep because I was afraid it was there.
My cousin actually did the sculpture of the dogeople as he likes to call them. I am better than all of you because my cousin fooled you guys. GAWTHROPE RULES!
Apple Evangelist 4 Life
its a owsome pic
That Human-dog pic at the top is NOT REAL. I think it’s an art installation.
That 2nd dog looks like its out of the gremlins movie
The first picture is obviously Jar Jar Binks. duh.
The second picture is a hardcore mohawk-sporting chihuahua who bit off his owner’s tongue.
First of all, the FIRST ONE is NOT A DOG. It is a sculpture done by a really famous sculptor. He was arguing how it would look/seem like if humans bred like dogs and how it would look like. So, no, the FIRST ONE is NOT A DOG.
OMG!!! the first picture, is it a human or a dog? Because it look like a human that has diseases but when I see the siblings, is it a puppy but it seems like a baby.
I almost believed that the first pic is real, goodness.
The first one is such a fake! All the dogs have got opposable thumbs! Only primates and monkeys can have opposable thumbs! FAKE! The writer for this article fails!
the first one is supposed to be manbear-pig
The second pic is NOT fake. It is an actual dog. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19388806/ His name is Elwood, he is a Chinese crested/chihuahua mix. He won the World’s Ugliest Dog contest in 2007.
And the second pic is a result of asshole owners who think mutilating the looks that nature has given their dog is a cool or hip thing to do.
= makes their poor pooches ugly and get stared at for the wrong reason.
THE FIRST PIC IS FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The first ‘Dog’ is art http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
The first picture is a sculpture by the hyper-realist artist Patricia Piccinini. It’s actually meant to be a mother pig with human features, rather than a dog. Still, it’s a testament to the artist’s work that people believe it to be real.
If you like hyper-realism, you should also check out Ron Mueck.
this surely cannot be pictures of real dogs
the first picture is fake guys. it’s not real, chill out. it is pretty disturbing though.
i luv this one they are so cute!!!I just luv dogs and they world of nature!!!!
omg WTF that is so scary and the first pic GROSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!